If I weren’t limited by the demands of the curriculum I’m completely
sure that I would reinforce and extend the body language block because I
believe that these kind of activities developing the student in an integral
way.
First of all, we need to know how important is body language in our
society and above all in the schools, so it’s not only a kind of human
communication, it’s the vehicle with people express something about them, their
feelings, emotions...and to accept the individually differences and developing
self-confidence. Today’s society is characterized by fast social and
technological transformations that result in a new scenario for public
participation that develop new ways of information and knowledge. In this
socio-economic-social-technological, Body Language (BL) is a proposal great
educational interest. The first task of the BL in Physical education (PE) is
the development of values minimum of coexistence creating spaces and learning
environments where freedom, creativity and love encourage personal development
and social of our students, becoming what they are potentially. The dimensions
of the BL promote the expression of the person, authentic communication,
personal and collective creativity and awareness aesthetics, through the healthy
game (is an holistic formation).
Body Language is vital in the field of education for its objectives,
content and creative methodology and tool life skills and active participation
in the construction of it. We can not forget that the BL is a pleasant and healthy
physical activity, accessible to everybody, whose axis "rotates around the
body, and the body is seen as <integrated person> sensory, psychological,
social inseparable unit and motor. By this interactive character I believe that
BL is a perfect way to work in a CLIL context so content, cognition,
communication and culture are developed through the movement and body
expression.
Secondly, I understand the way to assess these kind of activities
like an evaluation process that helps the students learn more (and / or correct
their mistakes) and for teachers to learn to work better (to improve their
teaching practice). To put it another way, the purpose is not to assess the
student, but to have information that allows to know how to help students
improve and learn more ... and that the teacher / to improve their teaching. The
evaluation must be more dialogue and mutual decision making or collective
rather than an individual and tax process. Within these processes of self-assessments,
assessments and dialogued ratings are more relevant techniques.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario